Live Flesch scoring, passive voice with the offending sentences quoted, sentence-length distribution, and a Google snippet preview measured in pixels. No focus keyword required — leave it blank and the tool tells you what topics your text reads as instead of complaining about 0% density.
A 0–100 scale where higher is easier. 60–70 is the target for business web copy — roughly 8th–9th grade. Below 50 you are losing readers who could have bought. Above 80 can read as patronising for a technical audience. It is computed from sentence length and syllables per word, so it is a proxy for effort, not for quality: a clear sentence about a hard subject still scores low.
Detected by finding a form of "to be" followed by a past participle ("was completed", "is being reviewed"). Under 10% of sentences is healthy. Passive voice is not wrong — it is right when the actor is unknown or irrelevant — but at volume it drains the agency out of sales copy. We quote the actual sentences so you can judge each one.
We report it because people ask for it, with an honest caveat: density has not been a meaningful ranking factor for over a decade. What still matters is placement — whether the phrase appears in the title, the first 100 words and a heading. So we check that too, and we flag stuffing above 3.5% as a risk rather than treating higher as better.
With no keyword supplied, the tool extracts repeated single words, two- and three-word phrases, and capitalised entity-like phrases. Use it as a mirror: if the top terms are not the topics you meant to own, the draft is about something other than you think it is — which is more actionable than any density percentage.
Google truncates titles and descriptions on pixel width, not character count, so a 55-character title in capitals gets cut while a 62-character lowercase one survives. The preview estimates width per character. It is an approximation, not a font metric — treat the boundary as "close to the edge", not a guarantee.
It does not judge whether your writing is any good, whether the claims are true, or whether it will convert. It measures mechanical properties of text. A draft can score 68 Flesch with 4% passive voice and still be worthless — and a great page can score badly. Use it to catch mechanical problems, not to grade the writing.
Use the readability findings to shorten long sentences and put the direct answer first, then check what customers actually ask with Find The Questions. A Page Audit afterwards confirms the technical side still holds. We apply the same answer-first approach in our AEO and GEO consulting. For weak links and decaying pages, use the Internal Link and Content Decay Finder.